Taylor China Weekly March 14, 2014

 

The week started with Panasonic, a huge Japanese global corporate, making not just a “cost of living adjustment” to salaries for its expats working in China, but actually a “cost of not living” adjustment to expat pay. What was most shocking in their announcement this week is that such a pay adjustment is not applicable to Chinese employees. I guess in their view, the life of a foreign expat is worth more than the life of a Chinese employee. Very scary indeed!

The saga of the non-bank lending continues, as apparently shadow lending in China ($7.62 trillion Q3 2013) has slowed significantly this month, due to active government intervention. Trust company shadow lending ticked up when local government investment companies and property developers were borrowing quite substantially, but were regarded as too risky by bank lenders due to the overall caps on bank lending imposed by the government, i.e. available funds went to the most credit worthy.

Mizuho Securities suggests that the efforts of the central bank to control the shadow banking sector are having results, which are reflected in the increase in on balance sheet bank loans that accounted for approximately 64% of new loans in China this year.

However, the big news this week for international markets was the warning by China’s premier, Li Keqiang, of potential bond or loan defaults by corporate borrowers. Historically most debt was quasi government guaranteed, as the government typically would bail out those who were over leveraged.

Needless to say, the world in on pins and needles waiting to see if new government deregulation allows defaults to occur, and potentially incite a “Lehman moment”. Although in the same breath, China’s premier was quick to say that China is projected to meet its 2014 GDP growth forecast of 7.5%.

Iron ore, the main commodity used to manufacture steel, prices tanked (Steel Index price reporting agency) this week as it was revealed that China steel mills have significant overcapacity and less than half of them are currently profitable. The fact that Haixin Steel, a privately owned steel mill, is technically in default of a bond repayment, certainly did not help support global iron ore prices or market values of the world’s biggest mining companies.  China consumes around two-thirds of the world iron ore consumption.

Finally, the most exciting news this week is that the Yu’e Bao an online money market fund, managed by Alibaba Group, topped Rmb500 billion ($81.4 billion) in total deposits with its 6 per cent on demand interest rate. No wonder, it’s a slam dunk in comparison to the government imposed, on demand bank savings account rate of 0.35 per cent.  Even the one-year bank deposit rate is only 3.3 per cent. The difference is truly “left over treasure” or Yu’e Bao.

Taylor China Weekly March 7, 2014

 

The question of how government economic reform will play out will certainly be an ongoing debate. There are the naysayers that say that the hugely debt perpetuated economic growth will eventually unravel and end in a severe economic downturn.

However, the Chinese communist government is still very powerful and very much in control. Unlike, other “free” economies, they still have the ability to counter balance destabilizing movements. Whoever said that transformation from an emerging economy to an economic leader would be smooth sailing.

The first ever, corporate bond default in China is nearly upon us. A solar cell maker, Shanghai Chaori Solar Energy, has announced that it will not be able to make an annual interest payment of Rmb89.8 million ($14.6 million) on bonds that it issued two years ago. Although this announcement should not be terribly unexpected, as the bond issue carries a CCC junk bond rating and trading was suspended last July.

Given the significant level of debt issuance from 2008 to 2013, which Standard and Poor’s estimates is around $12 trillion at year end 2013, defaults on riskier credits would be expected.

As us European high yield bond veterans recall back in the late 1990s, unsophisticated investors, such as the Italians of the day, just picked the names with the highest yields. Needless to say, it all went very badly for them when those risky, start up telecom issuers started to falter. An analyst at Moody’s claims the same is happening in the Chinese corporate bond market today. However, the difference here is that investors expect the Chinese government or other third parties to bail out the issuers in the end. Perhaps that will continue…

Buried somewhere in all the noise about the “slowing” Chinese economy, albeit the growth target for 2014 is still at 7.5 per cent, is the detail that the government must create enough jobs for 7.3 million university students graduating this year. Of course this number does not even include those students who are studying abroad and looking to return home after graduation. If only our government had an inclination to create new jobs for our college graduates.

Taylor China Weekly February 28, 2014

RMB PhotoThis week, it’s all about the renminbi.

Some say, Beijing has instigated the steepest fall in the value of its currency since the devaluation of 1994, when the export boom began. The main reason being to slow down the strengthening of the currency, which has hit a record high, and this could result in reducing China’s competitive position in the export market vis-à-vis other developing economies.

However, the central bank might also be attempting to control a more ominous activity of Chinese companies borrowing US dollars offshore, converting to renminbi, and shadow bank lending in China at loan shark rates. Or possibly investing in the ever rising, and likely unsustainable, Chinese property market. At the very least, the move could curtail betting on a stronger renminbi through the carry trade of borrowing in US dollars in Hong Kong at lower interest rates and taking the currency risk of converting to renminbi without hedging.

Assuming the renminbi continues to appreciate, the repayment of these loans would be even cheaper. Financial analysts at UBS have estimated that over the past year Hong Kong and Singapore have lent Chinese companies up to US$200 billion, the majority of which has been repatriated to the mainland.

On a more interesting note to us luxury handbag aficionados, an incredibly lucrative career as a daigou agent appears to be well established and growing with several hundred thousand now in business in Hong Kong. Essentially the role of a daigou is to acquire luxury products in foreign markets on behalf of wealthy Chinese individuals, and shuttle them over to the mainland at a great savings. China e-Commerce Research Centre suggests the daigou market reached RMB74 billion (US$12 billion) in 2013. Legal or illegal, it’s up for debate, but the Chinese government might accrue more customs duties by restricting individual border crossings to at least 10 a day.

Finally, having seen an Air Quality Index (www.aqicn.org) of over 500 in Beijing (greater then 300 rates as hazardous) and over 150 in Shanghai (greater than 150 rates as unhealthy), in comparison to 30 in London and 34 in New York, all of the above is completely insignificant in the index of humanity. If only those US dollar borrowings could be invested in a state of the art pollution conversion machine, generating off the charts green energy.

– Cynthia Taylor China Weekly